We will be glad to help and assist you in finding the crossword clues for the following clue: Do me a __….
looking at this crossword definition, it has 13 letters.
for better and easier way of searching the for a crossword clue, try using the search term “Do me a __… crossword” or “Do me a __… crossword clue” while searching and trying to find help in finishing your crosswords. Here are the possible answers for Do me a __….
We hope you found what you needed!
If you are still unsure with some definitions, don’t hesitate to search for them here in our site using the search box on top.
Possible Answers:
SOLID.
Last seen on: Daily Boston Globe Crossword Sunday, 22 October 2023
Random information on the term “SOLID”:
The single-responsibility principle (SRP) is a computer programming principle that states that “A module should be responsible to one, and only one, actor.” The term actor refers to a group (consisting of one or more stakeholders or users) that requires a change in the module.
Robert C. Martin, the originator of the term, expresses the principle as, “A class should have only one reason to change”. Because of confusion around the word “reason” he has also clarified saying that the “principle is about people.” In some of his talks, he also argues that the principle is, in particular, about roles or actors. For example, while they might be the same person, the role of an accountant is different from a database administrator. Hence, each module should be responsible for each role.
The term was introduced by Robert C. Martin in his article “The Principles of OOD” as part of his Principles of Object Oriented Design, made popular by his 2003 book Agile Software Development, Principles, Patterns, and Practices. Martin described it as being based on the principle of cohesion, as described by Tom DeMarco in his book Structured Analysis and System Specification, and Meilir Page-Jones in The Practical Guide to Structured Systems Design. In 2014 Martin published a blog post titled “The Single Responsibility Principle” with a goal to clarify what was meant by the phrase “reason for change.”