We will be glad to help and assist you in finding the crossword clues for the following clue: Mattress.
looking at this crossword definition, it has 8 letters.
for better and easier way of searching the for a crossword clue, try using the search term “Mattress crossword” or “Mattress crossword clue” while searching and trying to find help in finishing your crosswords. Here are the possible answers for Mattress.
We hope you found what you needed!
If you are still unsure with some definitions, don’t hesitate to search for them here in our site using the search box on top.
Possible Answers:
FUTON.
Last seen on: Canadiana – Oct 31 2022 Crossword Answer List
Random information on the term “Mattress”:
A bed frame or bedstead is the part of a bed used to position the bed base, the flat part which in turn directly supports the mattress(es). The frame may also stop the matresses from sliding sideways, and it may include means of supporting a canopy above. Bed frames are typically made of wood or metal. A bed frame includes head, foot, and side rails. Most double (full) sized beds, along with all queen and king size beds, require some type of center support rail, typically also with extra feet extending down to the floor. The term “bed frame” was first used in 1805-1815. Not all beds include frames; see bed base.
Brass beds are beds in which the headboard and footboard are made of brass; the frame rails are usually made of steel. Brass beds can be made of 100 per cent brass or of metals that have been brass-plated.[citation needed] The brass used in making brass beds is usually 70 per cent copper and 30 per cent zinc.[citation needed] The ratio of metals may vary between manufacturers.
Random information on the term “FUTON”:
The availability heuristic, also known as availability bias, is a mental shortcut that relies on immediate examples that come to a given person’s mind when evaluating a specific topic, concept, method, or decision. This heuristic, operating on the notion that, if something can be recalled, it must be important, or at least more important than alternative solutions not as readily recalled, is inherently biased toward recently acquired information.
The mental availability of an action’s consequences is positively related to those consequences’ perceived magnitude. In other words, the easier it is to recall the consequences of something, the greater those consequences are often perceived to be. Most notably, people often rely on the content of their recall if its implications are not called into question by the difficulty they have in recalling it.
In the late 1960s and early 1970s, Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman began work on a series of papers examining “heuristic and biases” used in the judgment under uncertainty. Prior to that, the predominant view in the field of human judgment was that humans are rational actors. Kahneman and Tversky explained that judgment under uncertainty often relies on a limited number of simplifying heuristics rather than extensive algorithmic processing. Soon, this idea spread beyond academic psychology, into law, medicine, and political science. This research questioned the descriptive adequacy of idealized models of judgment, and offered insights into the cognitive processes that explained human error without invoking motivated irrationality. One simplifying strategy people may rely on is the tendency to make a judgment about the frequency of an event based on how many similar instances are brought to mind. In 1973, Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman first studied this phenomenon and labeled it the “availability heuristic”. An availability heuristic is a mental shortcut that relies on immediate examples that come to a given person’s mind when evaluating a specific topic, concept, method, or decision. As follows, people tend to use a readily available fact to base their beliefs on a comparably distant concept. There has been much research done with this heuristic, but studies on the issue are still questionable with regard to the underlying process. Studies illustrate that manipulations intended to increase the subjective experience of ease of recall are also likely to affect the amount of recall. Furthermore, this makes it difficult to determine whether the obtained estimates of frequency, likelihood, or typicality are based on participants’ phenomenal experiences or on a biased sample of recalled information.